Pre-teens are gaining independence, but hygiene guidance can be inconsistent, awkward to ask for, and difficult to turn into routine.
Make accountability feel caring rather than punitive by linking completed routines to a companion’s care and growth.
Five retrospective interviews surfaced inconsistent learning, embarrassment, forgetfulness, and a desire for greater autonomy.
A testable product loop combining self-guided education, customizable routines, rewards, and companion care.
Because direct access to pre-teens was limited, I conducted five retrospective interviews with young adults about their hygiene experiences ages 10-13. Across parents, school, dentists, peers, media, and trial and error, participants described inconsistent guidance, embarrassment, forgetfulness, and weak accountability.
I paired this with secondary research and one target-age prototype test. These inputs shaped the direction, but they do not prove lasting habit change.
How might FreshUp help pre-teens practice hygiene more independently without making the experience feel clinical, childish, or punitive?
Research suggested that information alone would not address forgetfulness, limited accountability, or the discomfort of asking for help.
I connected daily routines to the companion’s care. Completing a task earns Happiness Points and changes the companion’s state, while short learning content explains why each routine matters.
Education and follow-through support the same goal: helping users practice independently.
A conventional streak or score would make FreshUp feel like another tracker and separate progress from the product’s emotional hook.
The companion changes state as the user completes routines and earns Happiness Points. Care, expression, and customization make progress visible without relying on a dashboard alone.
The companion responds to the user's absence, and the follow up is easily doable to ease pressure on user.
The companion was FreshUp’s most distinctive assumption. If it did not feel present or rewarding, the concept would lose its emotional center.
I built a working AR experiment to explore whether the companion could extend beyond the main app experience.
Peer feedback suggested that the AR experience was delightful, but it did not yet justify further investment. Making it meaningfully engaging would require more animation and target-age testing, while the core routine-and-companion loop was still unresolved. I paused AR development and prioritized strengthening the main product experience first.
The participant completed the prototype and described it as fun and easy to use. Tasks, customization, and the companion-supported return state stood out.
Test the routine loop with more children over time, evaluate whether companion states motivate without guilt, and involve guardians or safeguarding experts.
I began with a broad subject - pre-teen hygiene - and narrowed it into a behavioral hypothesis: gentle accountability through companion care could support independent follow-through. Framing the problem gave me something concrete to design and evaluate.
I revisited and rebuilt flows whenever feedback or closer review showed they were not working, even late in the process. I learned to prioritize the strength of the experience over preserving work simply because it was already polished.
The usability session showed early appeal and comprehension, but not lasting behavior change; testing the routine-companion relationship over time would be my next priority.
I had no previous animation experience, but taught myself AI-assisted animation and AR prototyping to explore how the companion could feel more alive. I do not wait for complete mastery before starting - I learn enough to build, test, and decide whether an idea deserves further investment.